Hi Roni,
Comments inline below and some snipping of the thread.
Thanks,
Mary.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Roni Even
<ron(_dot_)even(_dot_)tlv(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Mary,
When I read the charter it is not clear why from the first paragraph you
deduct the second paragraph.
If the first paragraph will say
" The goal of this working group is to enable inter-domain communications
over the Internet, using protocols such as SIP, while still allowing people
to use the called person assigned circuit switch phone number for
identifying the person with whom they wish to communicate. "
It may look clearer.
[MB] We could change "phone number" to "called person assigned circuit switch
phone number for identifying the person", but I think that "phone
number" is well
understood to be exactly what you want to describe it as. [/MB]
Still this is based on the assumption that using other ways to assign and
authenticate SIP phone numbers using central databases is not catching up
because the carriers object to implement it and not due to any other reason
like preferences of enterprises IT to use PSTN for calls because of better
quality of service and manageability.
[MB] I'm not certain (personally) that the latter preferences you note
are as prevalent as you might suggest. I would still contend that the
larger issue is the former. However, if other folks share this
concern, we can certainly add that as well - it reflects equally as
being a non-technical reason for widespread implementation [/MB]
Roni Even
-----Original Message-----
From: dispatch-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:dispatch-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of Mary Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 6:24 PM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Cc: DISPATCH; IETF-Discussion list
Subject: Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
Hi Dan,
The term peer to peer is intended to exclude mechanisms that would use
a central repository for the information: This was discussed in an
earlier thread:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg02027.html
In one sense it is a solution, however, in another sense it is reusing
SIP related functionality defined in RAI and thus is in a similar vein
as specifying the use of SIP in a charter.
Thanks,
Mary.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
<dromasca(_at_)avaya(_dot_)com> wrote:
The VIPR WG will address this problem by developing a peer to
peer based approach to finding domains that claim to be
responsible for a given phone number and validation protocols
to ensure a reasonable likelihood that a given domain
actually is responsible for the phone number.
Hi,
Clarification question. What exactly means 'peer to peer based
approach'
and what kind of approaches are excluded by having this in the
charter.
Does 'approach' mean solution? If so why does a specific type of
solution need to be agreed in the charter, while all we have at hand
at
this point are individual contribution I-Ds that describe the
'problem
statement and some possible starting points for solutions'?
Thanks and Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: dispatch-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:dispatch-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 8:38 PM
To: DISPATCH
Subject: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3
_______________________________________________
dispatch mailing list
dispatch(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf