ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3

2010-07-01 13:46:53
Hi Dan,

The term peer to peer is intended to exclude mechanisms that would use
a central repository for the information:  This was discussed in an
earlier thread:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch/current/msg02027.html

In one sense it is a solution, however, in another sense it is reusing
SIP related functionality defined in RAI and thus is in a similar vein
as specifying the use of SIP in a charter.

Thanks,
Mary.

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
<dromasca(_at_)avaya(_dot_)com> wrote:
The VIPR WG will address this problem by developing a peer to
peer based approach to finding domains that claim to be
responsible for a given phone number and validation protocols
to ensure a reasonable likelihood that a given domain
actually is responsible for the phone number.

Hi,

Clarification question. What exactly means 'peer to peer based approach'
and what kind of approaches are excluded by having this in the charter.
Does 'approach' mean solution? If so why does a specific type of
solution need to be agreed in the charter, while all we have at hand at
this point are individual contribution I-Ds that describe the 'problem
statement and some possible starting points for solutions'?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: dispatch-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:dispatch-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 8:38 PM
To: DISPATCH
Subject: [dispatch] VIPR - proposed charter version 3


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>