This is the sort of thread I usually don't respond to, but we have this debate
about top-posting so often I just can't resist this time. (Must have been
something in my coffee.)
Personally, I don't care whether people bottom-post, top-post, or comment
in-line. What I dearly wish for (but do not expect to ever get) is
consistency.
At least two or three times a week, someone forwards me an email thread with 8
or 9 embedded messages that works out to six or seven hundred lines of text. A
couple were top-posted, a couple bottom-posted, and the remainder inserted
comments in-line. Yuck. Trying to follow the conversation at that point is
incredibly confusing. Start at the top, jump to the bottom, oh, this one is
in-line... Now my head hurts, I need more coffee, and I still haven't figured
out the point of this stupid thread.
I should note that this sort of mess would be easiest if everyone bottom-posted
(because I could just read the mess in order) but consistent top-posting or
commenting in-line can be followed fairly reasonably as well. So, I propose
the following etiquette: first responder chooses the style (e.g., in-line,
top-post, bottom-post). Anyone that responds to *that* email should follow the
established precedent.
And yes, I am aware that it will never happen.
Tim
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf