Because. Its not declining or disappearing .. just ask the mobile operators
who have added several billion new mobile handsets over the past few years.
Analog POTS is certainly dying but the E.164 namespace is doing even better
than domain names.
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Masataka Ohta
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 1:14 AM
To: David Conrad
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: draft-iab-dns-applications - clarification re: Send-N
David Conrad wrote:
In the intervening decades, it is probably worthwhile dealing
with the reality that PSTN (and hence E.164) exists.
But, why do we have to be bothered by proposals for more efficient
processing of the declining and disappearing E.164?
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf