I notice that the RFC Editor has a Citations Committee; should they be
responding to this issue?
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com>
To: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Wikipedia
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 05:24:21PM +0100, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 15/Dec/10 03:02, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
IMHO, whether to use temporal coordinates (where available) should be
left to authors' judgment. Some authors diligently monitor the
relevant Wikipedia pages.
It makes no difference whether authors monitor the relevant Wikipedia
pages, because you can't update the references section of the RFC once
it's published.
I find it slightly astonishing that the RFC Editor's instuctions on
URLs don't require a visited-on parameter. Just about every academic
style guide requires such a note for the obvious reason that the
target of a URL can change. The whole reason we have the citation
traditions we do is so that someone can follow the reference later and
look up the material in question. This is an important feature of any
reference, because without it the citation is all but worthless: it
does nobody any good if you include a citation and then nobody can
check whether you understood (or even quoted) the material correctly.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com
Shinkuro, Inc.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf