On 17.12.2010 15:33, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
17.12.2010 16:29, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 17.12.2010 15:20, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
...
In previous version there have been the 'server' and 'client' terms
instead 'host'. However it is obvious for me that there can be as
servers as clients that do not recognize some headers of another side of
exchange.
...
But clients can't respond with the header, so there's no point in
pretending this applies to them.
In my document the term 'header' means 'header field' since client are
able to put any header to the request and I meant just it.
I realize that you use "header" as synonym for "header field".
What I was trying to say was that it doesn't make sense to speak of
clients and servers in general, when it's really only the server who can
set the H-N-R header field.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf