[Top] [All Lists]

Re: prerequisite for change (was Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels)

2011-01-30 09:15:18

On Jan 30, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 09:27:17AM -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

The raising of the bar for proposed standard has a very simple reason: it is
now almost impossible to change specifications once deployed.

That's an argument for _no_ maturity levels, then, not for two.   

Is there an implicit assumption here that more standards (presumably of poorer 
quality) is a good thing?

Ietf mailing list