A few years ago some of us tried to interest the IETF in producing "road
maps" for all the major protocols/protocol families. As a worked
example, we produced a roadmap for TCP. It seems to me that you are
asking for more roadmaps.
Bob Braden
On 3/1/2011 4:18 AM, Shane Kerr wrote:
Mark,
FWIW, this came up in the dnsext working group a few years ago. In the
end, I don't think anything was done, which is kind of a shame. A lot of
old protocols could benefit by "this is what is important" documents
(search the RFCs for "FTP" or "TELNET" to get some examples of protocols
with lots and lots of RFCs that make it hard to decipher).
Even worse for actual operators who may actually want to use the IETF
recommendations and not become IETF experts!
I'll join the<rfc-interest(_at_)rfc-editor(_dot_)org> list as Joel suggests,
although it seems quite chatty with procedural stuff. :-/
--
Shane
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf