On 3/1/11 12:43 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-03-02 01:29, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:18:12PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
FWIW, this came up in the dnsext working group a few years ago. In the
end, I don't think anything was done, which is kind of a shame.
Nothing was done for want of workers ;-) We concluded there was no
real room in official IETF channels for such a publication,
I have asserted for some years that the "Applicability Statement"
subset of the standards track, defined in RFC 2026, could perfectly well
be used for explaining how a group of RFCs fit together. There have
been various proposals for more specific methods than that which haven't
caught on, but the real problem has already been mentioned:
in v6ops ops we have documents like:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-jankiewicz-v6ops-v4v6biblio-03.txt
opsec
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsec/draft-ietf-opsec-efforts/
Nothing was done for want of workers ;-)
It is a lot of work. I've done it for IETF process RFCs and even that
was a lot of work:
http://www.ietf.org/about/process-docs.html
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf