2011/4/7, Russ Housley <housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com>:
Mykyta:
If this approach is acceptable to the community, implementation reports will
no longer be needed at all.
In this case your document should obsolete RFC 5657 and mention this.
Mykyta
Russ
On Apr 7, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
06.04.2011 18:27, Russ Housley wrote:
This revision proposes a solution to the issue raised by Brian Carpenter
about documents lingering at Draft Standard. Some people thought it was
a problem. Others thought it did not matter. The proposed solution
leaves the matter in the hands of the IESG.
I can hardly see my comments from 18 March
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg65911.html)
considered in -05. Are you planning to make any changes regarding this in
-06?
Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Russ
Begin forwarded message:
From: IETF I-D Submission Tool<idsubmission(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Date: April 6, 2011 11:22:25 AM EDT
To: housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com
Cc: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net, eburger(_at_)standardstrack(_dot_)com
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-05
A new version of I-D, draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-05.txt has been
successfully submitted by Russ Housley and posted to the IETF
repository.
Filename: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
Revision: 05
Title: Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels
Creation_date: 2011-04-06
WG ID: Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 7
Abstract:
This document proposes several changes to the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF) Standards Process defined in RFC 2026, primarily a
reduction from three IETF standards track maturity levels to two.
{{ RFC Editor: please change "proposes several changes to the" to
"changes the". }}
The IETF Secretariat.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf