-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John Levine
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 5:39 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-10.txt> (DKIM And
Mailing Lists) to BCP
[...]
I'd suggest publishing it as Informational or Experimental rather than
BCP.
It originally started out as Informational but there was at some point WG
consensus to shift it to using normative language, making BCP the appropriate
status.
I don't think I'd object to going back to Informational. I imagine I can get
the diffs out of RCS and just play them backwards if that's the way we decide
to go.
-MSK
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf