Mark Andrews <marka(_at_)isc(_dot_)org> wrote:
DNS[WB]L's have never been a good fit to the DNS, rather they have
not been a bad enough fit to require something better to be done.
Oh come off it, they are just as good a fit to the DNS as reverse DNS is.
The naive approach of reversing the address, converting to nibbles
and appending a suffix won't scale.
I don't understand why the setup is OK for reverse DNS but not blacklists.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at> http://dotat.at/
Hebrides, Bailey, Fair Isle, Faeroes: Southeast 5 to 7, backing east or
northeast 4 or 5, occasionally 6 in north Bailey. Moderate or rough.
Occasional rain. Moderate or good, occasionally poor.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf