On Wednesday, July 06, 2011 04:49:47 PM Martin Rex wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
I was however willing to accept "historic" as a reasonable
compromise.
"historic" as a compromise? Between which two positions?
Nuking it from orbit, and erecting a statue in its honor?
Which to options that are actually available to the IESG? I see
extremist-A: nuke/kill 6to4 by moving 3056/3068 to historic
compromise: move 3056/3068 off Standards Track,
i.e. by reclassifying them as Experimental
blocked: leave 3056/3068 at Proposed, publish only 6to4-advisory
extremist-B: stick fingers in ears, sing la-la-la, pretend 6to4 is perfect
I think I've read this entire thread and I don't recall anyone advocating
extremist-B.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf