On Jul 5, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
what people are saying is kill it because it is broken, bad, and does a
dis-service to ipv6.
Actually, I seem to have been the only person who proposed killing it-- the
rest of you seem to have settled on merely looking at it crossly and hoping it
will wither away in shame.
By that I mean, I wrote up and circulated an Internet Draft to specify a
phase-out plan for RFC 3056 and RFC 3068. I chose not to submit it when it was
made clear to me that no such plan could be adopted as a working group item.
On a related note, I much prefer Keith Moore's proposal to reclassify RFC 3056
and RFC 3068 as Experimental.
--
james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)apple(_dot_)com>
member of technical staff, core os networking
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf