ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

2011-07-06 11:46:26
On Jul 5, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Randy Bush wrote:

what people are saying is kill it because it is broken, bad, and does a 
dis-service to ipv6.

Actually, I seem to have been the only person who proposed killing it-- the 
rest of you seem to have settled on merely looking at it crossly and hoping it 
will wither away in shame.

By that I mean, I wrote up and circulated an Internet Draft to specify a 
phase-out plan for RFC 3056 and RFC 3068.  I chose not to submit it when it was 
made clear to me that no such plan could be adopted as a working group item.

On a related note, I much prefer Keith Moore's proposal to reclassify RFC 3056 
and RFC 3068 as Experimental.


--
james woodyatt <jhw(_at_)apple(_dot_)com>
member of technical staff, core os networking



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf