ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic

2011-07-06 15:52:10
Doug Barton wrote:

On 07/06/2011 13:14, Martin Rex wrote:

Doug Barton wrote:

I was however willing to accept "historic" as a reasonable compromise.

"historic" as a compromise?  Between which two positions?

Nuking it from orbit, and erecting a statue in its honor?

Which to options that are actually available to the IESG?  I see

extremist-A:  nuke/kill 6to4 by moving 3056/3068 to historic

compromise:   move 3056/3068 off Standards Track,
              i.e. by reclassifying them as Experimental

blocked:      leave 3056/3068 at Proposed, publish only 6to4-advisory

extremist-B:  stick fingers in ears, sing la-la-la, pretend 6to4 is perfect


-Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf