On 2011-07-28 11:13, Martin Rex wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Responding to Glen Zorn's question in plenary:
Firstly, not all ADs review all drafts - that's why you will see
numerous "no objection" or missing ballot responses.
I can understand the resource contention when reading drafts
brought to the IESG. I would not expect that more than 25% of
the IESG members have reviewed a draft (no average) when it is
up for ballot. But for _standards_action_, I would probably
appreciate if there was a minimum requirement of "yes" ballots
(definitely more than just one) based on independently formed
opinions, which requires some level of review of a document.
See http://www.ietf.org/iesg/voting-procedures.html
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf