On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Eric Burger
<eburger-l(_at_)standardstrack(_dot_)com>wrote:
+$1.00
Have we ever had a BOF that looked under-attended? Not me: always standing
room only!
I would also argue that you want "BOF tourists." They might turn into
participants. They also might point out
things like overlap with previous work in the IETF or some other SDO.
Regards
Marshall
Big rooms = good BOF.
On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 7/28/11 4:06 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
When we ask for a BoF room, we need to give an indication of estimated
attendance. Sometimes it’s hard to make a good guess and so we
underestimate, intending to keep larger rooms available for groups that
need them.
I think the BoF chairs and responsible ADs need to request larger rooms
for BoFs. After the REPUTE BOF, I talked with the Secretariat
(specifically Wanda Lo, who does an amazing job with the schedule!)
about poking the chairs and ADs when they request BoF rooms to make sure
that we don't assign small rooms to BoFs, at least without careful
consideration.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf