On 2011-09-11 08:11, Sam Hartman wrote:
<snip>
I do not think the following types of comments should be considered as
objections when judging this sort of consensus:
2) This will not do any good
now lets see, this argument seems to be that the fact that a particular process
change is useless should not
stop the IETF from adopting the change
this argument would be nonsense if applied to a proposal for a technical
standard - i.e. the
IETF should adopt a technical standard that is known to be useless -- it is no
less nonsense when
applied in this case - changes for the sake of publishing new bits should not
be what the IETF
spends its time on
Scott
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf