On Sep 10, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
I do not think the following types of comments should be considered as
objections when judging this sort of consensus:
1) You are not solving the most important problem
I don't think that was anybody's objection. Rather, the objection were against
change for the sake of change without any convincing argument that the change
would improve things; and/or that the changes would actually make it more
difficult to improve things.
2) This will not do any good
IMO, that is a valid objection. Stability in our process is desirable;
therefore change merely for the sake of change is undesirable.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf