I think you will see that this question was discussed at least once. We asked
about moving to a one-level maturity model instead. The conclusion was that it
was possible to go from a two-level to a one-level in the future if that is
appropriate. However, if we go straight to a one-level now, and then learn
that a two-level would have been better, we would be stuck.
Russ
On Sep 11, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
I personally view it as a tiny effort to remove an unused feature from our
process. It could have removed two levels instead of one, but would that have
made it easier or harder to find consensus for the change?
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf