ps - as Keith points out - a round of this type of effort was undertaken by the
newtrk
working group a while back (I was the chair and did not see much reason to
do so at the time but there was consensus in the WG to proceed) - I will note
that it took quite a bit of work to ensure that technologies were actually
unused
Scott
On Sep 15, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Scott O Bradner wrote:
I'm fully supportive of reclassifying any RFCs that pose a risk to the
Internet
to historic but fail to see the usefulness of doing so for RFCs that describe
unused but non-harmful technologies - seems like busywork and useless at best.
Scott
On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
Dear all,
I've recently received a message from Ronald Bonica, one of the ADs,
proposing undertaking an effort to reclassify many pre-IETF (pre-1000) RFCs
as Historic. However, I initially had a concern regarding community
consensus on such effort, and whether it will be accepted so that the IESG
may claim the former. Since I've already suggested a very similar proposal,
and there was a negative reaction of community, I assumed the same would
happen in the case Ronald pursued the work and forwarded it to the IESG. So
am I right?
Mykyta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf