On Oct 20, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
One thing to consider is charging for this service
I have no problem paying some fee to the IETF in order to get better remote
participation capability when I am unable to travel to the location chosen.
I would much rather pay $200-$300 to have good remote attendance capability
(video etc.) than get by on 'free'.
This would be assuming that there would be some markup on the remote attendance
cost to finance the secretariat etc.
I disagree. If the remote participation service is high quality, it should
require the same registration fee structure as on-site participation.
Thanks,
Acee
This is not something I would have suggested until recently because the
broadband connectivity has not been up to it until very recently.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Randy Bush
<randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com<mailto:randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com>> wrote:
i read the message from ray as an rfp for someone to write the rfp for
remote services. aside from being a very amusing bureaucratic layer
cake, this would not seem to need a lot of experience with remote
access, but rather good ears and a taste for the bureaucracy and discord
the ietf has become.
randy
--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf