ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: The US Federal Communications Commission just sent theIETFRAI/SIPcommunity an early Christmas present...

2011-11-07 14:50:43


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Michel Py
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 12:05 AM
To: Worley, Dale R (Dale); Richard Shockey; John Leslie; IETF-Discussion
list
Subject: RE: The US Federal Communications Commission just sent
theIETFRAI/SIPcommunity an early Christmas present...

Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
it appears that their intention is to require IP-to-IP
interconnection.  The "carrier with a majority of TDM clients"
will probably have to provide IP interconnection.

Being an outsider, I wonder how big the stick is. 
[RS> ] Its pretty big baseball or cricket bat. E.164 voice traffic is a
fully regulated service with lots and lots of obligations associated with it
and a very very large contingent of lawyers in DC to either enforce it the
Act or find loopholes.

But nevertheless I
would say well played, as it indeed appears that the "TDM heavy"
carriers will have little or no choice but to pay top dollar for an IP
upgrade from the TDM vendors who provided them with their gear.
[RS> ] Well the other argument is the carriers have little or no choice at
this point since the classic Class 5 SS7/TDM gear (DMS-5ESS) is well beyond
its 25 year life cycle and is literally cracking up.  The cost differential
between a  Class 5 and a IMS/CSCF running SIP is not even close .. plus the
5E, for instance use 400 amps to service, I believe only 100,000 customers.
Plus the people operating these switches are retiring by the bushel full. 

Would you like gravy on your Christmas turkey?

Michel.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>