ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

2011-11-29 09:31:14
Doug,

I did not refer to your message. The only two responses to the October 10 Last 
Call regarding draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-09 were:

- 
https://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=60292&tid=1322579909
- 
https://www.ietf.org/ibin/c5i?mid=6&rid=49&gid=0&k1=933&k2=59923&tid=1322579994

The message that you reference below, as well as many other messages,  were in 
response to a an August 19 Last call regarding 
draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03. Many of the problems pointed out 
in that last call were addressed between versions 03 and 09 of the document. 
However, many were not. Therefore, I summarized what I believed to be the 
outstanding issues in the message that I posted last night.

If I missed any outstanding issues, please add to the list.

I hope that this helps.

                                            Ron



-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb(_at_)dougbarton(_dot_)us]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 10:18 PM
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: Ronald Bonica; IESG IESG; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request


[snip]


... and a meta-issue for Ron. I saw a lot more opposition to the
document in the last call than you did. Are you by any chance referring
to my message at
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg69583.html below?
If so, I guess I needed to actually say the words, "I oppose
publication
of this document?" If I wasn't clear, sorry.


Doug


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf