ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Consensus Call (Update): draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

2011-12-07 13:52:39

"David" == David Conrad <drc(_at_)virtualized(_dot_)org> writes:
    David> On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
    >> The CGN space seems like a very good place to use 240.0/10.

    David> I believe the main driver behind this discussion is the need
    David> to deal with deployed non-field-upgradable CPE that has
    David> issues with having RFC 1918 space being assigned on the WAN
    David> interface.  I'd guess said hardware would also likely have
    David> issues with 240/4 space being instead.

You'd guess, or you know.
I'd like to see 240.0/10 assigned for this purpose, regardless of
whether or not we assign another block.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ottawa(_dot_)on(_dot_)ca 
http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
                       then sign the petition. 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>