On 12/4/11 12:33 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
3) Use RFC-1918 address space. That would work for pure "consumer" applications, but
would break things like remote employees using VPNs. I don't think that's a result we should want
to happen, because it affects "good-citizen" Enterprises who aren't even using that ISP
while their employees are using the ISP.
Maybe I'm not understanding the problem you're worried about here, but
as far as I can tell, remote employees using VPNs are still a problem
with a new allocation: If an enterprise has two remote sites, each
served by a different CGN, those two sites will get address conflicts in
the new space. A new allocation doesn't solve that problem.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf