On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Maybe I misunderstood your concern. The operator's server to the operator's
routers only involves the operator's internal network. While I would
personally prefer a mandatory-to-implement mechanism, I can see that
operators do not necessarily want prescriptive statements on this part of the
specification.
Hahhh..
I don't see a requirement that says that the RPKI cache much be on the local
operators network, else you just created an industry for 60k+ caches, at
least(!)..
Additionally, we should apply this to all IGP work? Why are we doing KARP?
And why no bi-lateral, so we don't really need transport protections at all in
eBGP?
Not subscribing to this...
-danny
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf