* Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2012-01-01, at 15:51 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
* Thomas Roessler wrote:
Before these steps have happened, it would appear premature to me to
request publication of this document as an RFC.
Neither the intention to last call the draft, nor the proposed
incompatible change were announced to that list.
So what is the point of order you are trying to raise? Registering the
link relation pretty much requires publication of the draft as RFC, so
the intent should be implicit, and given the length of the draft, and
my review comments, the timing should be rather clear to anyone who
cared aswell, so I don't see how the request for publication was prema-
ture.
If you only want to make sure interested parties are aware of the state
of the discussion around the document, you can just tell them, like I
did when I copied my review comments to spec-prod, or point this thread
out to W3C's IETF Liaison so they can spread the word for you.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern(_at_)hoehrmann(_dot_)de ·
http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf