ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00.txt> (The 'disclosure' Link Relation Type) to Informational RFC

2012-01-01 12:55:36
* Julian Reschke wrote:
I'm almost with you.

However, changing the actual definition and adding an additional post LC 
would be kind of surprising, wouldn't it?

Among the goals of the Internet Standards Process are "openness" and
"fairness" and I would find these principles grossly violated if the
IESG would approve the document for publication with the proposed
changes applied but without another Last Call. With another Last Call
and if there is rough consensus in favour of the changes, and that'd
include running code, then that's fine with me, regardless of whether
an intention to publish an Internet-Draft as RFC is communicated to
some obscure W3C mailing list, or who communicates such an intention.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern(_at_)hoehrmann(_dot_)de · 
http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>