> From: Nilsson <mansaxel(_at_)besserwisser(_dot_)org>
>> denying this block is likely to _accelerate_ usage of what space
>> remains
> What happened to
>>> - See CGN deployed using various hacks (e.g. squatting on space)
>>> - See CGN deployed using a block of space allocated for that purpose
> ...that were the ONLY two choices we have?
> Suddenly, you introduce a third.
No. 'Everyone allocating their own CGN block' falls under "various hacks" (i.e.
option i).
> Let me quote from RIPE-530, the in-force allocation policy document
> for RIPE NCC
Well, I guess European ISPs are going to be forced to squat, then (there are a
number of non-backbone-routed /8s allocated to things like intelligence
agencies, which are unlikely to appear on the backbone) - unless we can get a
common CGN block allocated from elsewhere.
Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf