ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?

2012-03-16 15:30:55
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:49 PM, IAOC Chair 
<bob(_dot_)hinden(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:

The IESG and IAOC are considering an addition to the IETF meeting week, and 
we would like your views before we develop the idea further.

At NANOG, there is a Beer and Gear reception one evening.  There are 
exhibitor tables with product vendors (hardware and software) and service 
providers (registries, registrars, ISPs, ESPs, etc.) and anyone else 
interested in face time with NANOG participants. They show their equipment 
and services.  There is bar in the center of the room serving beer, wine, and 
soft drinks. There are hors d'oeuvres scattered around the room.

 QUESTION:  What do you think about doing a Beer and Gear style
            of event on an evening that does not conflict with
            other IETF activities?

This would be an opportunity for free food and drink for attendees, for 
vendors and service providers to talk with IETF participants, and for 
additional revenue to the IETF.  Obviously, attendance would be optional.

Technical people are at the tables, not sales or marketing staff.  Vendors 
know that the audience is very technical, so they send the people that can 
communicate with that audience.

We would charge for exhibit tables, to raise additional funds for the IETF. A 
stronger base of opportunities for IETF sponsorship distributes our funding, 
making it less fragile; this could make it less likely that we would have 
last-minute scrambles for additional sponsors, including hosts. A successful 
Beer-and-Gear like event would not solve this but it would help.

In the past, the IETF has avoided vendor exhibits and demonstrations. 
 However it is clear that NANOG has found a balance that works and that NANOG 
participants and the vendors consider the event valuable.  We believe this 
could translate well to the IETF.

We are considering some test events, hopefully to be held at IETF 84 
(Vancouver, July 2012) and IETF 85 (Atlanta, November 2012).

The kinds of evaluation criteria we are considering could include:

- Did participants enjoy the event?

- Did vendors consider the event successful?

- Did the IETF raise additional funds?

- Did the event "steal" potential sponsors away from other
 aspects of the meeting?

So, what do you think?  Is this something that we should try?

Please respond on the ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mail list.

On behalf of the IESG and the IAOC,

Russ Housley
Bob Hinden

My first gut reaction.

On the plus side:

   * This kind of event is usually fairly interesting (at least,  _I_
enjoy them and since I am a man, every man enjoys them (proof by bad
syllogism :-) )

   * The possibility of raising some more funding is interesting

On the "dubious" side

  * "on an evening that does not conflict with other IETF activities"
I did not attend many meeting so far (I began being involved just a
couple of years ago), but I remember somehow a well-packed schedule.

Anyway, in science (and engineering) experimental results rule: let's
try for a couple of meeting and let see if this can be made to work.
If you say that it works for NANOG (who are still engineers, right?),
why not for us?

Riccardo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>