The abstract mentions 'many people', because many people may mean 4 to 10
people. The annonced I-D lacks the method of discussion in the community
(discussing such change), the draft mentions the input from any community
individual to be accepted by editor and then approved by IESG, but does
not
mention the methodology of discussion between community members nor
between editor and members, also no announcements of such updates
mentioned in draft.
On this, as well as on the rest of the comments in the same message:
The IETF already has a process for discussion, review, and consensus, and
this document neither changes any of it nor, I think, needs to repeat it.
Barry