ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

2012-11-06 16:23:14
On 11.6.2012 17:17 , "Paul Wouters" <paul(_at_)cypherpunks(_dot_)ca> wrote:

On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Stephan Wenger wrote:

So, to summarize, out of the 60 or so non-third-party disclosures that
have been made over the last 4+ months, only "a few" may or may not be
late; the rest almost certainly is not.

Do we have a list of known IPR for which no disclosure was filed
whatsoever (a.k.a. very very very late or possible never filing on
purpose) ? Without that information, I don't think we can judge how
well the Note Well is working currently.

Obviously, I do not have such information.  Let me return the favor: do
you know how much better a shorter, albeit badly aligned with policy, Note
Well would work?

Stephan


Paul