Hi Michael,
+1 for the deadline
- 1 for the unified slide deck: from my experience with Meetecho, this is not
always a good idea, both because of the deck's dimensions and of the
difficulties in automatically recognizing speakers' switches (e.g. for the
recordings of the single presentations).
My 2 cents,
Simon
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> ha scritto:
"Thomas" == Thomas Narten <narten(_at_)us(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> writes:
Thomas> IMO, what is missing is operational Best Practices. We seem
Thomas> to be lacking them (are any written down?) And we don't
Thomas> follow them consistently, especially from one WG to
Thomas> another. Many of the problems I see with remote
Thomas> participation facilties have to do not with the technology
Thomas> per se, but with lack of proper training and advance
Thomas> testing. I get the general sense that getting the remote
+5.
I am setting a deadline for slides for IETF86 for my WG, and I will be
doing a unified slide deck. I might allow text on a slide to be
updated the day before... but no slides, no speak.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software
Works