On 2/25/13 7:02 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
Or, I can change the "about" to "roughly". I think the number is
likely a tad higher.
I'd actually guess that it's considerably higher, although I don't
know that "I'd actually guess" is a useful metric.
[MB] It is an example and it's the only one I'm familiar with although
I assume other countries have similar laws. The last sentence
referencing the ADA is a very important distinction in terms of who is
required to obey the law, but perhaps it's not particular useful or
relevant to this document, so I can remove that sentence. [/MB]
This probably goes to the broader question about this particular
meeting (IETF 86( but I think it's important to note -somewhere-
that just because a particular facility/building meets ADA
requirements does not mean that the meeting is particularly
accessible.
I like this document, and I think it will also be very useful for
people who would like to come to a meeting but unsure about
being able to eat. I'd like to see it progress.
Melinda