submission allowed + publication posted but not fully considered in the WG
discussions?
On Mar 7, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote:
Submission allowed; publication postponed?
/Elwyn
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 10:34 +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote:
Oh, and one more data point:
The Internet-Draft archive also functions as a timestamped signed public
archival record of our "inventions".
(Which are often trivial, but triviality won't stop patenting of copycats,
while a good priority more likely will.)
This function is effectively suspended for six weeks a year.
Grüße, Carsten
PS.: (If that sounds like I'm contradicting myself that's only because we
haven't found the right solution yet.)
On Feb 27, 2013, at 19:49, Carsten Bormann <cabo(_at_)tzi(_dot_)org> wrote:
On Feb 27, 2013, at 19:18, ned+ietf(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com
wrote:
routing around obstacles
It turns out for most people the easiest route around is submitting in time.
That is actually what counts here: how does the rule influence the behavior
of people.
Chair hat: WORKSFORME. (And, if I could decide it, WONTFIX.)
Grüße, Carsten