Re: Getting rid of the dot

On 19 Mar 2013 22:47, "Ole Jacobsen" <ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:

I can just see the list of MUST, SHOULD and MAY have attributes,


Tsk. RFC 2119 only applies to interoperability requirements, as you well
know.

So unless we're also swapping t-shirts...

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Getting rid of the dot, (continued) Re: Getting rid of the dot, Scott Brim Re: Getting rid of the dot, John Levine Re: Getting rid of the dot, Doug Barton Re: Getting rid of the dot, Michael Richardson Re: Getting rid of the dot, Ole Jacobsen Re: Getting rid of the dot, Sumanth Channabasappa Re: Getting rid of the dot, Scott Brim Re: Getting rid of the dot, Spencer Dawkins Re: Getting rid of the dot, John Levine Re: Getting rid of the dot, Ole Jacobsen Re: Getting rid of the dot, Dave Cridland <= RE: Getting rid of the dot, l.wood Re: Getting rid of the dot, Eliot Lear Re: Getting rid of the dot, Erik Fair Re: [IETF] Getting rid of the dot (was: Mentoring), Warren Kumari Re: Getting rid of the dot, Brian E Carpenter Re: Getting rid of the dot, Yao Re: Getting rid of the dot, Spencer Dawkins Re: Mentoring, Brian E Carpenter Re: Mentoring, Adrian Farrel Re: Mentoring, Adrian Farrel

Previous by Date:	RE: Getting rid of the dot, l.wood
Next by Date:	Re: Getting rid of the dot, Yao
Previous by Thread:	Re: Getting rid of the dot, Ole Jacobsen
Next by Thread:	RE: Getting rid of the dot, l.wood
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]