ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication

2013-04-05 09:06:53
I too have always found at least one of the Crocker brothers {suspicious, 
smart, funny, irrelevant, prescient, handsome, annoying, etc.}. I've never been 
able to tell which is which :)

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 5, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Michael Richardson 
<mcr+ietf(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> wrote:


"Loa" == Loa Andersson <loa(_at_)pi(_dot_)nu> writes:
   Loa> thinking about this and assuming that the FTL Communication are 
deployed
   Loa> in a not too far distant future, wouldn't we have started to receive
   Loa> packets that was sent in the future already now?

I for one, have always found these Crocker brothers suspicious: always
seem to have been at the key points in Internet future history.
I think that they are in fact a single person.  
One is going forward in time, and the other one backwards. 
(Which is which, is still open to debate)

So I claim that we  will have been receiving packets from the future for
some time now.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks 
[ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  
[ 
]     mcr(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby 
on rails    [ 
   

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>