At 03:59 PM 4/5/2013, Dave Cridland wrote:
Actually, getting rich without implementing anything seems to happen
quite often enough these days - it's called acquisition.
or be a Kardashian
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
<<mailto:wbeebee(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>wbeebee(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
Or use the FTL to predict the company stock price so that you get rich
without
implementing anything.
- Wes
On 4/5/13 5:12 AM, "Adrian Farrel"
<<mailto:adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>adrian(_at_)olddog(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
>So instead of asking the community "do you have an intention to implement
>and
>deploy?" we should ask "have you already been going to have implemented
>and
>deployed yet?"
>
>>> thinking about this and assuming that the FTL Communication are
>>> deployed in a not too far distant future, wouldn't we have started
>>> to receive packets that was sent in the future already now?
>>
>> Indeed, and this tells us that publication of this was important,
>> since we'll need to be in a position to handle the issues that will
>> occur much sooner than deployment, and for that matter
>> development of the technology.
>