ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first

2013-04-09 02:02:32

There's a lot of hysteresis... because calling it funny is often a stretch.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On 
Behalf Of Scott Brim [swb(_at_)internet2(_dot_)edu]
Sent: 08 April 2013 20:34
To: Lucy Lynch
Cc: ietf; Abdussalam Baryun
Subject: Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April    
the first

On 04/08/13 13:35, Lucy Lynch allegedly wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote:


If the date is special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.

I thought they should be classified as "hysterical".

there is an echo (echo) ((echo) ) in here (here) ((here))

IETF humor has lots of hysteresis.