ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first

2013-04-08 12:33:53
from [Lucy Lynch] [Permanent Link] 
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote:




If the date is special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.


I thought they should be classified as "hysterical".


there is an echo (echo) ((echo) ) in here (here) ((here))


- Wes
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections, Keith Moore
Next by Date:  Re: draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01, John Curran
Previous by Thread:  Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Next by Thread:  Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Scott Brim
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]