Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the

If the date is special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.


I thought they should be classified as "hysterical".

- Wes

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, (continued) Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Melinda Shore Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Dave Cridland Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Ulrich Herberg Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Melinda Shore Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Andrew Sullivan Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Abdussalam Baryun Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Margaret Wasserman Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Yoav Nir Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Bob Braden Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Wes Beebee (wbeebee) <= Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Lucy Lynch Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, Scott Brim RE: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first, l.wood

Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first