ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SHOULD and RECOMMENDED

2013-06-25 09:08:59
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker 
<hallam(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
I DO NOT agree that 2119 is the only source of consequence here.

Sorry.  RFCs are not written in English, they are written in RFCish, a
language based in English but with modifications (specified in RFCs).
2119 overrides anything you might think you know about what words
mean.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>