I do have an identical twin brother, and hashing the DNA sequence collides more
regularly than either random or MAC-based interface-identifiers in IPv6.
Also, he doesn't have the same opinions.
Greg Daley
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Phillip Hallam-Baker
Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2013 11:33 AM
To: John Levine
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List
Subject: Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Levine
<johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com<mailto:johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com>> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Since this has turned out to be ambiguous, I have decided to instead use a
SHA-256 hash of my DNA sequence:
9f00a4-9d1379-002a03-007184-905f6f-796534-06f9da-304b11-0f88d7-92192e-98b2
How does your identical twin brother feel about this?
His opinion is identical to my own.
--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/