ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Sergeant at arms: please deal with mars(_dot_)techno(_dot_)cat(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com

2013-10-26 02:58:46
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:40 AM, John Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> wrote:
<snip>
In this particular case, the execution was clumsy, but the action was
entirely appropriate.  We saw messages that were utterly irrelevant,
from an address that had never sent anything else, in a style that
strongly suggested it was a sock for a chronic troublemaker.  Why
should we put up with that kind of nonsense?

+1 to that.

I've keept quiet in this case because it was such an obvious case of
troublemaker that showed up.

Can we let it go and move on since it seems like we actual agree but
just need something to discuss?


-- 

Roger Jorgensen           | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com          | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no   | roger(_at_)jorgensen(_dot_)no

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>