Re: #506, was: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-24

On 2013-10-30 08:46, S Moonesamy wrote:
> ...
> > Such as?
> What I mean is that what happens is undefined when both sides do not
> follow the RFC 2119 "should".
The response is self-descriptive, so it's up to the client to properly 
process it.
> > It is supposed to be interpreted per RFC 2119.
> It is better to use the uppercase words after the RFC 2119 boilerplate.
But then, we don't want the boilerplate to be in front of the 
Introduction. Any *concrete* suggestion how to address this?
Best regards, Julian