On 11/10/13 11:09 AM, l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk wrote:
And not a single woman in that photograph.
What does that tell you?
Maybe that women don't have (gray) beards ????
I wonder thouw if the bears are grey or gray??
Mmm since we are "US-controlled" or "US goeverned" ??, it is probably gray
indeed.
Sorry, could not resist. Take it as a joke please.
Bert
Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/
________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of SM [sm(_at_)resistor(_dot_)net]
Sent: 09 November 2013 18:18
To: Andrew G. Malis
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: A sort of council of elders for the internet
Hi Andrew,
At 08:24 09-11-2013, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
You mean these guys?
https://lh3.ggpht.com/-ai1q4K9pDro/UjIAlfBQGoI/AAAAAAAAAUo/akcJfTCa9mY/s1600/IETF73-graybeards.tiff
The specification was as follows:
"If your beard is white, gray, flecked with gray or on the brink of graying,
your presence is requested. No minimum length requirement. Honorary
graybeards welcome (those with a valid biological reason for NOT growing
a prodigious gray beard, but otherwise qualified)"
At 08:51 09-11-2013, Ted Lemon wrote:
Harald and Dan don't have grey beards in that picture, so that can't be it.
As there is photographic evidence of graybeards and it is compliant
with the specification, it must be true that it is the sort of
council of elders for the internet.
Regards,
-sm