Re: Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alt

FWIW, I agree with the chairs that issuing a straw poll is completelywithin normal IETF processes, and something that does not requireascertaining WG consensus before one does it.

I'll certainly watch with great interest how the results of the poll(due more than a month from now) are treated by the chairs.


       Harald

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Magnus Westerlund Re: Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Harald Alvestrand <= Re: Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Dave Crocker Re: Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Dave Cridland RE: Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) RE: Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Adam Roach RE: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, l.wood Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Martin Thomson RE: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) RE: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, l.wood Re: [rtcweb] Matthew's Objections: was Re: Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives, Ted Hardie

Re: Matthew's Objections: was Re: [rtcweb] Straw Poll on Video Codec Alternatives