Jari, you can’t be serious. unlimited means -without- limit, not just the
limits of your imagination.
Patrick, perhaps more to the point, the ramifications (consequence analysis)
of managing transitions between variable code/address realms.
Its not just expansion, its flow between larger/smaller, and smaller/larger.
we are back to NAT/ALGs _again_
/bill
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet.
On 4January2014Saturday, at 1:31, Patrik Fältström <paf(_at_)frobbit(_dot_)se>
wrote:
On 4 jan 2014, at 09:29, Jari Arkko <jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net>
wrote:
One important change is that every future application protocol proposal
should be required to have an effectively unlimited code space for
assignment.
Agree.
I do not agree regarding the term "unlimited".
What is needed is that the specification do have a consequence analysis
regarding expansion of use.
Patrik