ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IANA blog article

2014-01-04 13:46:39
On 05/01/2014 01:10, John C Klensin wrote:

--On Saturday, January 04, 2014 10:31 +0100 Patrik Fältström
<paf(_at_)frobbit(_dot_)se> wrote:

On 4 jan 2014, at 09:29, Jari Arkko <jari(_dot_)arkko(_at_)piuha(_dot_)net>
wrote:

One important change is that every future application
protocol proposal should be required to have an effectively
unlimited code space for assignment.
Agree.
I do not agree regarding the term "unlimited".

What is needed is that the specification do have a consequence
analysis regarding expansion of use.

At least if it isn't unlimited, but I agree with Patrik.

There's some discussion of what can go wrong in RFC 6709, Section 4.4
on "Parameter Space Design".

    Brian